All Oculus Quest developers MUST PASS the concept review prior to gaining publishing access to the Quest Store and additional resources. Submit a concept document for review as early in your Quest application development cycle as possible. For additional information and context, please see Submitting Your App to the Oculus Quest Store.
Traditionally, high quality audio reproduction has been the domain of multi-speaker systems, often accompanied by one or more subwoofers. However, with the rise of online gaming and voice chat, many players have transitioned to headsets (headphones with integrated microphones).
Headphone audio will be the standard for VR into the future, as it provides better isolation, privacy, portability, and spatialization. For modern VR, especially with head tracking and user movement, speaker arrays do not provide an adequate audio experience.
Headphones offer several significant advantages over free-field speaker systems for virtual reality audio:
Headphones are available in a variety of types with various trade-offs:
As a general rule of thumb, closed back headphones offer the most isolation and bass response. However, the closed construction may lead to discomfort (due to heat and weight), and they tend to offer less accurate reproduction due to internal resonance. Also, if placed on or over the ear, they cause the pinnae to impact sound reproduction slightly.
While acoustic isolation can help with immersion, it cuts listeners off from their environment so they may be unable to hear others entering the room, cell phone ringing, doorbell, et cetera. Whether that is a good thing or not is up to the individual.
Open back headphones are generally more accurate and comfortable than closed-back headphones, but they do not isolate listeners from the exterior environment, and broadcast to the surrounding environment as well. These are suitable for quiet areas devoted to a VR experience, possibly in conjunction with a subwoofer.
As with closed back headphones, when placed on or over the ear, open back headphones allow the pinnae to impact sound reproduction slightly.
Earbuds (such as those that ship with cell phones or portable music players) are cheap, lightweight, and very portable, though they typically lack bass. Some models, such as Apple EarPods, have surprisingly good frequency response, albeit with a steady roll off of bass frequencies. These are mostly ignored for spatialization.
Most earbuds are poor at isolation.
In-ear monitors offer superior isolation from your environment, are very lightweight, and have excellent frequency response over the entire range. They remove the effects of the listener’s pinnae from sound (unlike on-ear headphones). They have the downside of requiring insertion into the ear canal, which eliminates the effects of the ear canal from sound reproduction entirely (since most HRTFs are captured with microphones right outside the ear canal).
Headphones, like all transducers, impart their own characteristics on signals, and since HRTFs are frequency sensitive, removing the headphone character from the signal will usually be beneficial. This can be accomplished by deconvolving the output signal with the headphone’s impulse response.
Until recently, the most common way to provide sound immersion was to surround the listener with speakers, such as a Dolby 5.1 or 7.1 speaker configuration. While partially effective for a fixed and narrow sitting position, speaker array systems suffer from key drawbacks:
It is doubtful that multi-speaker configurations will be common or effective for home VR applications, though they may be viable for dedicated commercial installations.
Bluetooth has become a popular communication method of wireless audio broadcast. Unfortunately, modern Bluetooth implementations often incur significant latency, sometimes as high as 500 milliseconds. As a result, Bluetooth technology is not recommended for audio output.